Who's going to win the presidential election? The stock market has a prediction.
By Mark Hulbert
The stock market has a stronger statistical record than the several other indicators that I analyzed
There's a 64% probability that Kamala Harris will win this November's presidential election, given the stock market's strong year-to-date performance.
This is moderately higher than the 58% probability I reported in a column this past May. That's because the stock market is higher now than it was then, and there is a significant correlation between the stock market's election-year performance and the incumbent party's chances of retaining the White House.
Read more economic and political news
Many readers have been urging me to update that column, now that President Biden has withdrawn from the race and Kamala Harris is the presumptive Democratic Party nominee. But the change in candidates does not impact the statistical conclusion, which is based on the identity of the incumbent party rather than the nominee. The only input to my simple statistical model is the Dow Jones Industrial Average's DJIA year-to-date return, which is higher today than three months ago.
It's important to put this model's conclusion in its proper context. On the one hand, it by no means is a guarantee. In 2016, for example, the stock market on Election Day was sitting on modest year-to-date gains and the incumbent party still lost. In any case, it's entirely possible the stock market will fall between now and Election Day and thereby reduce the probabilities currently calculated by my model. Harris's probability of winning would drop below 50%, for example, if the DJIA's year-to-date return on Election Day were to be negative.
On the other hand, the stock market has a stronger statistical record than the several other indicators that I analyzed, such as the economy (as measured by GDP), the Conference Board's consumer-confidence index and the University of Michigan's consumer-sentiment survey. Look at the accompanying chart, which was built by dividing all election years since 1900 into thirds, based on the DJIA's year-to-date return on Election Day. Notice that the incumbent party's chances of winning rise with each tertile.
What about the electronic futures and betting markets? Given that they have been around for just a handful of presidential election cycles, there is too little data to know whether they have a better track record than the stock market. Nevertheless, I note that those markets currently are placing similar odds on a Harris victory as my stock market model. The Harris contract at PredictIt.org, for example, is giving her a 58% probability of winning.
Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com
-Mark Hulbert
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
08-20-24 1423ET
Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.-
What’s the Difference Between the CPI and PCE Indexes?
-
Micron Earnings: Great Guidance but Stock Now Looks Fairly Valued
-
August PCE Report Forecasts Show More Good News on Inflation
-
AI Stocks May Be Down, but Don’t Count Them Out
-
4 Stocks to Buy as the Fed Cuts Interest Rates
-
Markets Brief: The Uncertain Path to Neutral Interest Rates
-
What’s Happening in the Markets This Week
-
Where Top Stock Fund Managers Are Looking Next After the Fed Rate Cut
-
Our Top Pick for Investing in US Renewable Energy
-
Undervalued by 25% and Yielding 5%, This Stock Is a Buy
-
Can AI Predict Future Stock Returns?
-
The Best Energy Stocks to Buy Now
-
10 Undervalued Wide-Moat Stocks
-
Obesity Drugs: Can New Firms Take Market Share From Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk?
-
New 4-Star Stocks
-
Intel Fair Value Left Unchanged Despite Qualcomm Takeover Talk