JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Eq ETF earns a High Process Pillar rating.
The primary contributor to the rating is its parent firm's excellent long-term risk-adjusted performance, as shown by the firm's average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars. This fund tracks an index, which also increases its process rating. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, shows that passively managed funds have generally outperformed their active counterparts, especially over longer time horizons. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 53% strengthens the process. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and outperformed their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their respectable success ratio suggests that this firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that.
The investment strategy as stated in the fund's prospectus is:
The investment seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, and to the performance of the JPMorgan Asset Management Carbon Transition U.S. Equity Index. The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in securities included in index. The index is designed to capture the performance of companies which have been identified through its rules-based process as better positioned to benefit from a transition to a lower carbon economy while also providing broader U.S. market exposure.
The portfolio is overweight in technology by 4.2 percentage points in terms of assets compared with the category average, and its real estate allocation is similar to the category. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are industrials and consumer defensive, with industrials underweighting the average portfolio by 2.7 percentage points of assets and consumer defensive similar to the average. The strategy owns 414 securities and its assets are more dispersed than the typical peer in the category. In the most recent disclosure, 33.0% of the strategy's assets were concentrated in the top 10 fund holdings, as opposed to the category’s 48.5% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, this portfolio turns over its holdings less quickly than peers, potentially leading to lower costs for investors and eliminating a drag on performance.