JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF JIRE

The portfolio maintains a cost advantage over competitors, priced within the lowest fee quintile among peers.

The strategy's effective investment philosophy supports an Above Average Process Pillar rating. Independent of the rating, analysis of the strategy's portfolio shows it has maintained an overweight in liquidity exposure and momentum exposure compared with category peers. High liquidity exposure is attributed to stocks with a high trading volume, lending managers more flexibility. And momentum exposure is rooted in holding stocks currently on a winning streak. The strategy’s management team earns an Above Average People Pillar rating. The strategy's parent organization earns the firm an Above Average Parent Pillar rating. People Pillar and Parent Pillar ratings for this strategy are indirectly assigned by a Morningstar analyst rather than algorithmically derived. Please see the notes following each pillar section for more details. The details of assigning methods can be found in each pillar section.

JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF earns an Above Average Process Pillar rating.

The leading factor in the rating is its parent firm's superior long-term risk-adjusted performance, as shown by the firm's average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 57% also supports the rating. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and beat their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their relatively high success ratio suggests that the firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that. Lastly, the process is limited by being an actively managed strategy. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, finds that actively managed funds have generally underperformed their passive counterparts, especially over longer time horizons.

This strategy leans toward larger, more growth-oriented companies than its average peer in the Foreign Large Blend Morningstar Category. Examining additional factor exposure, this strategy has consistently tilted toward companies with relatively higher trading volumes in the last few years. More-liquid assets are easier to buy and sell without adversely moving their prices and tend to provide some ballast during market selloffs. They also are easier to sell to meet redemptions if a host of investors decide to leave the fund in a short period of time. Different from its historical appetite, however, the strategy was less exposed to the Liquidity factor compared with Morningstar Category peers in the most recent month. This strategy has had more exposure to high-momentum stocks over its peers in recent years. Momentum is based on the premise that market outperformers will continue to outperform, and laggards will continue to lag. This means that managers are overweighting stocks currently on a winning streak. Compared with category peers, the strategy also had more exposure to the Momentum factor in the most recent month. In addition, this strategy has an underweight bias to the volatility factor, meaning investing in stocks that have a lower standard deviation of returns. Such holdings can limit a strategy's downside, but cause it to lag in bull markets. In recent months, the strategy also had less Volatility factor exposure than its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.

The portfolio is overweight in healthcare by 2.6 percentage points in terms of assets compared with the category average, and its utilities allocation is similar to the category. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are technology and basic materials, with technology underweighting the average portfolio by 2.5 percentage points of assets and basic materials similar to the average. The portfolio is positioned across 203 holdings and is relatively top-heavy. Of the strategy's assets, 20.2% are concentrated within the top 10 holdings, as opposed to the category’s 15.1% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, on a year-over-year basis, 16% of the fund's holdings have turned over, whether through increasing, decreasing, or changing a position.

The team is backed by Piera Elisa Grassi, the longest-tenured manager on the strategy, who brings 20 years of listed portfolio management experience. Piera Elisa Grassi draws on only two other listed supporting managers. Although, together they are adequately equipped, with nine years of average listed portfolio management experience. As a team, they manage two investment vehicles together, with solid long-term prospects. The strategies average a Silver asset-weighted algorithmically-assigned average Morningstar Medalist Rating, indicating a position to deliver positive alpha in aggregate. The highest personal investment in the fund by any of its managers is between$ 100,000 and$ 500,000. That's on the low side--it would need to be more than$ 1 million for us to see the investment as sufficient to promote the strong alignment of their interests with the strategy's investors.

Note: The People Pillar rating is indirectly assigned by an analyst. The longest-tenured manager of the fund also manages a different product rated by an analyst. Their analyst-assigned People Pillar rating is combined here with the People scores (algorithmic or analyst-assigned) for the fund’s other managers on a tenure-weighted basis.

As of 2022, this investment stalwart manages more than USD 2.5 trillion in AUM. Composed of various global cohorts and diverse asset classes, the firm has more tightly integrated its capabilities in recent years, notably through the development of proprietary analytical and risk systems. Investment teams are robustly staffed and helmed by seasoned contributors. The firm’s strategies tend to produce reliable portfolios, and several flagship offerings are Morningstar Medalists. Manager incentives align with fundholders'; compensation reflects longer-term performance factors, and portfolio managers invest in the firm’s strategies as part of their compensation plans.

The firm’s funds tend to be well-priced, but they aren’t as competitive as many highly regarded peers of similar scale. Recent product launches include thematic and single-country strategies, both of which carry the potential for volatile performance and flows, along with misuse by investors. The firm remains intrepid when it comes to developing an environmental, social, and governance-focused framework and continues to move into other areas such as direct indexing through its 55iP acquisition and China through its joint venture, but these complicated initiatives take time to assess any real and lasting effect.

This share class’ quantitatively driven Performance content was not generated because of insufficient data. To generate individualized content, the Medalist Rating quantitative analysis requires sufficient data to generate its framework of “ mental models ” designed to mimic content written by analysts.

Past performance is not predictive of future results, and, therefore, Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not anchored on short-term results and instead focus on long-term risk and return patterns. Performance receives no explicit weighting in Morningstar’s analysis but is referenced as a part of the People, Parent, and Process evaluations.

It is good practice to weigh them heavily in any investment evaluation. This share class lands in the cheapest quintile of its Morningstar Category. Its low fee, taken together with the fund’s People, Process, and Parent Pillars, indicates that this share class should be able to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark, leading to its Morningstar Medalist Rating of Silver.