Peltz Joining P&G Board? No Big Deal
The wide-moat company is prudently reducing complexity in its operations and appropriately refocusing its brand investments to better align with evolving consumer trends, efforts that will take time to yield material gains.
Activist investor Nelson Peltz, who holds a stake in
We believe P&G’s decision to part ways with more than 100 brands over the past three years (which wrapped up in October 2016) is evidence that the company is working to be a more nimble and responsive operator in the highly competitive consumer product landscape. In our view, these actions position P&G to focus its financial and personnel resources on the highest-return opportunities from a brand as well as category perspective, which should ultimately drive accelerating sales and volume growth and aid the brand intangible asset source of its wide moat. We think the benefits of this focus are starting to surface--the company posted 2% organic sales growth in the fourth fiscal quarter in the face of intense competition and on top of similar growth a year ago--but it will take a few more quarters before we view this as sustainable.
We don’t intend to alter our $94 fair value estimate (based on 4% annual sales growth in the longer term and 300 basis points of operating margin expansion to nearly 25% at the end of our 10-year explicit forecast) as a result of this news. The shares generally trade in line with our valuation, but if P&G's top-line and profit trajectory falters and its share price suffers, we’d suggest investors consider building a position.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.