Managed Care Organizations: Investment Opportunities and Risks Ahead of the Election

Near-term regulatory risks in US healthcare could benefit long-term investors.

Healthcare Sector artwork
Securities In This Article
UnitedHealth Group Inc
(UNH)
Humana Inc
(HUM)
Elevance Health Inc
(ELV)
CVS Health Corp
(CVS)
The Cigna Group
(CI)

As the election approaches, managed care organizations face significant regulatory risks associated with US healthcare spending that could damper industry profitability.

Fortunately for investors in managed care organizations, we think the near-term regulatory risks of this election cycle look manageable, despite current pockets of weakness in Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and pharmacy benefit management.

Some of these near-term regulatory risks are even creating opportunities for long-term MCO investors.

We keep our moat ratings at narrow for the six publicly traded MCOs that we cover, which insure over half of the US. That includes Humana HUM, Centene CNC, CVS CVS, Elevance ELV, UnitedHealth UNH, and Cigna CI.

4 Headwinds Facing the Managed Care Organization Industry

Given their competitively advantaged plan offerings, the MCOs that we cover look likely to continue expanding their coverage of the US population during the next 10 years, even amid headwinds.

The main industry headwinds that we see look likely to ease in the intermediate term:

  1. Renewed Medicaid eligibility redeterminations that are cutting into that population and creating a mismatch of rates and acuity in the remaining population should largely ease by the end of 2024.
  2. Medicare Advantage plan growth may be constrained through 2026 because of recent regulatory actions. Still, we think that Medicare Advantage growth will likely be stronger than other plan types for the next decade owing to demographic trends, increasing popularity versus traditional Medicare, and ongoing rate increases.
  3. Pharmacy benefit managers face regulatory scrutiny for their lack of transparency, but even if spread and rebate-related pricing is eliminated, we expect the PBMs to switch most clients over to fee-based arrangements to largely offset that potential headwind.
  4. Election cycles can create volatility in MCO shares, but if mixed control of the federal government continues, then MCOs will likely enjoy a relatively benign policy environment in the near term.

We expect the six main companies to cover 59% of the population by 2033, up from 51% in 2023, as they continue to grow their membership bases by 2% (compared with less than 1% expected US population growth) on solid expansion in Medicare, individual exchange, and employer plans.

Top-Tier MCOs Look Likely to Continue Gaining Market Share in the Medical Insurance Industry and Grow Membership at 2% CAGR

Bar chart showing that the top MCO share of the population is slated to grow to 59% by 2033, up from 51% in 2023 and 39% in 2013.
Source: Morningstar analysis of company reports and US Census Bureau. Data as of September 2024.

How to Position Your Investment Portfolio Before the 2024 Election

Lessons learned after taking a deep dive into how markets behaved after the 2016 and 2020 elections.

Managed Care Organizations Hold Narrow Moats but Face Longer-Term Policy Risk

Still, while some of these narrow-moat companies are stronger than others, none appear able to escape the policy risk that this industry faces.

Specifically, we believe that the MCOs we cover will generate economic profits for at least the next 10 years, but the potential for regulatory pressure on industry profitability reduces our confidence about the wide-moat time frame of 20 years.

Our Best Idea in the industry is Humana, which continues to face uncertainty around its intermediate-term profit trajectory in the highly regulated Medicare Advantage market.

Medicaid and individual plan leader Centene also looks undervalued, while CVS’ problems in Medicare Advantage and PBM transparency concerns keep its shares deeply discounted. Cigna, Elevance, and UnitedHealth shares look fairly valued.

Company
Ticker
Market Cap $ in Billions
Moat Rating
Capital Allocation Rating
Uncertainty Rating
Star Rating
Fair Value (as of Sept. 19, 2024)
Price/Fair Value (as of Sept. 19, 2024)
UnitedHealthUNH532NarrowExemplaryMedium3 stars$5500.95
Elevance HealthELV125NarrowStandardMedium3 stars$5500.98
CignaCI99NarrowStandardMedium3 stars$3660.97
CVS HealthCVS74NarrowStandardMedium5 stars$930.63
HumanaHUM38NarrowStandardMedium4 stars$4730.67
CenteneCNC40NarrowStandardMedium4 stars$920.83

Stock Market Sentiment Often Depends on US Healthcare Policy Initiatives

From 2008 to the end of August 2024, shares of the six MCOs collectively returned 11% compounded annually on 11% average earnings per share growth—but it was a bumpy ride for investors, especially in election years when Democrats were advancing.

For example, although the Affordable Care Act of 2010 wound up expanding the industry, the years leading up to its 2014 implementation were tough for MCO investors, similar to when Democrats considered a policy in the 2020 election primaries that would have eliminated private insurers.

MCOs Have Produced Strong Shareholder Returns, Despite Policy Risks That Pushed Down Shares and P/E Multiples in Some Election Cycles

Line chart showing equal-weighted Big Six MCO Index returns of 11% on adjusted EPS growth of 11%, compound annually from 2008-24.
Source: Morningstar analysis and PitchBook data on Centene, Cigna, CVS Elevance, Humana, and UnitedHealth as of Aug. 30, 2024.

The potential for major changes to the US healthcare system largely swings with control of the federal electable bodies. Risks could rise for MCO profits if the pendulum of control swings toward one party in the 2024 election. However, if mixed control of the federal government continues, then MCOs will likely enjoy a relatively benign policy environment in the near term.

One thing Republicans and Democrats appear to agree on, though, is that PBM transparency probably needs to increase, which creates a low-single-digit profit risk for the MCO industry, by our estimates.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

More in Stocks

About the Author

Julie Utterback, CFA

Senior Equity Analyst
More from Author

Julie Utterback, CFA, is a senior equity analyst, AM Healthcare, for Morningstar*. She focuses on medical technology and service companies. She covers managed care organizations including UnitedHealth, service providers like HCA, medical suppliers such as Baxter, and life sciences companies like Danaher. She is also the chairperson of the equity research team’s capital allocation methodology.

Before joining Morningstar in 2005, Utterback was an equity analyst at State Farm Insurance for several years. Utterback joined Morningstar in 2005 as an equity analyst in the healthcare industry, and initially she primarily covered medical technology companies, including orthopedic device, medical equipment, and cardiac device firms. In 2010, she joined Morningstar's credit research team, initiating coverage of the entire healthcare industry and generally helping the organization expand and maintain its credit coverage across many industries. She held that senior credit analyst role until April 2019, when she returned to the equity team to cover medical technology and service companies.

Utterback holds a bachelor's degree in finance from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign’s Gies College of Business. She also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

* Morningstar Research Services LLC (“Morningstar”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc

Sponsor Center